The autopsy report for the late singer MohBad, also known as Ilerioluwa Aloba, has finally been made public.
The autopsy took place at the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LASUTH), where samples of Mohbad’s lung, liver, kidney, and stomach contents were taken for a toxicology examination.
Mohbad’s right forearm was injured, according to the anatomical and pathological findings, and his body was excavated with moderate to severe decomposition.
The singer’s death could not be linked to ‘any significant gross finding,’ according to the autopsy results.
Autopsy report Mohbad’s death
Diphenhydramine, an antihistamine, was detected positively in the toxicology report, however the quantity was not lethal or fatal.
The document determines that a medication response or anaphylactic shock could occur.
The body was not embalmed before burial and was exhumed eight days subsequently, according to the study, which could have had an impact on the toxicology findings.
Anti-histamine medications are used to treat allergy symptoms. They are also used to treat a wide range of other ailments, including anxiety, colds, and gastrointestinal issues.
According to the study, the reason of death was unknown. But it did stress that there might be a possibility of an adverse effect from the medication given any notable toxicology and post-mortem data.
The report notes that ‘it is noteworthy that the body was not embalmed or subjected to an autopsy prior to interment on the second day.’
‘As Per the Directive for Exhumation: On September 21, 2023, the body was dug up (8 days after the burial).
The organs had moderate to severe decomposition, according to the autopsy. There were no notable gross findings that could be linked to the death, with the exception of the minor injury on the right forearm.
In light of this, toxicological samples were collected. This is to find out if there was a common household poisoning, substance addiction, overdosage, or anaphylactic reaction.Diphenhydramine, an antihistamine, was found to be beneficial in toxicology; yet, this dose was neither dangerous or fatal. The other analytics showed nothing special.
‘A blood sample must be obtained as soon as feasible in order to determine fatal anaphylactic shock.
Sadly, the deceased’s interment on the second day hindered or rendered this impossible. Considering the as mentioned above, the reason of death was unknown.
‘Having said that, given the lack of noteworthy toxicological or post mortem results, the possibility of a fatal anaphylactic shock (drug reaction) could be taken into consideration’
